ASPPH logo


Member Research & Reports

Member Research & Reports

UAB: Short-term Disability Progression in Two Multi-ethnic Multiple Sclerosis Centers in Treatment Era

Short-term disease progression in multiethnic multiple sclerosis is well documented in clinical trials, but there are limited published data on disease course in real-life practice. Dr. Gary Cutter, professor in the department of biostatistics at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health worked with others from the New York University Multiple Sclerosis Care Center to compare data.

Patient-derived Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (PMSSS), a disease severity rank score, was computed at each visit for consecutive MS patients attending two large, ethnically diverse MS centers in New York metropolitan area. Disability was assessed via Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Clinicians recorded disease subtype and relapse status at each visit, but did not rate disability. PMSSS change from the first to the last visit was calculated for the cohort as a whole and for subgroups of interest. Multivariable regression models were constructed for predicting final PMSSS based on readily available predictor variables collected at the initial visit and relapse history during follow up.

A total of 1740 consecutive patients from New York University (n = 1079) and Barnabas (n = 661) MS Care Centers were included. During follow up (mean 2.4 ± 0.82 years, range 1–4 years), mean PDDS score increased from 1.9 ± 2.2 to 2.3 ± 2.2 (p < 0.0001), while PMSSS remained roughly unchanged (initial PMSSS = 3.71 ± 2.73, last PMSSS = 3.81 ± 2.76, paired t test, p = 0.28). The only major predictor of final PMSSS was the initial PMSSS. Demographic variables (age, sex, race) or relapse status did not predict final severity score.

The authors concluded that the baseline disability in two MS clinics was much lower than in the reference population from which PMSSS was derived. We observed no discernable slowing of disability accumulation during the short-term follow up in our cohort compared with the reference cohort. Overwhelmingly the most important predictor of final disease severity rank score was the initial disease severity rank score.

Read more